DJI Raises Concerns Over FCC Proposal Impacting Commercial Drone Usage

DJI Raises Concerns Over FCC Proposal Affecting Drone Operators

DJI has issued a warning to U.S. drone operators regarding a proposal from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that targets certain foreign-made “military-grade” drones. The company argues that the implications of this proposal could extend beyond military applications, potentially impacting a wide range of commercial and civilian drones.

Implications of the FCC’s Proposal

In its response to the FCC’s action from July 21, DJI contends that the categories under consideration include capabilities commonly found in commercial drones. These capabilities encompass:

• Thermal imaging
• LiDAR technology
• Agricultural spraying
• Docking stations
• Drones weighing 55 pounds or more

DJI emphasizes that while the proposal is framed as targeting “military-grade” drones, it could inadvertently affect products utilized by first responders, farmers, infrastructure inspectors, small businesses, and hobbyists.

DJI Challenges the Definition of Military-Grade

Central to DJI’s argument is the distinction between a drone’s technical capabilities and its intended use. The FCC is soliciting comments on whether additional restrictions should apply to various categories of foreign-produced unmanned aerial systems (UAS) already on its Covered List. DJI asserts that the technologies in question are not inherently military in nature.

“DJI does not design or manufacture military-grade equipment, nor has it marketed or sold its products for military use,” the company stated. “DJI develops technology for commercial, agricultural, recreational, and public safety applications, and has consistently opposed the weaponization of civilian drones.”

DJI cites LiDAR technology as an example of a capability that could be misclassified under the proposed definitions, potentially affecting even consumer models used for safety features.

Potential Impact on Existing Drone Models

DJI highlights a significant difference between the current restrictions on the Covered List and the new proposal. The addition of DJI products to the Covered List in December 2025 prevented new models from receiving FCC authorization, although existing products could still be imported and sold. The current proposal could extend to prohibiting the import, marketing, or sale of certain foreign-made UAS and critical components.

DJI explains that while individuals may continue using their existing DJI products, the same models may not be available for future purchase. This shift could impose additional costs on U.S. operators.

The FCC has clarified that any potential prohibition would not affect the operation of drones already purchased, but it could impact future imports and sales, which is particularly relevant for organizations that rely on fleet operations.

Concerns for Public Safety and Agriculture

DJI has expressed concerns that the proposed categories could significantly impact established civilian applications. Key areas affected include:

• Search and rescue operations
• Firefighting and inspection
• Agricultural drone applications
• Remote and automated operations for infrastructure inspection and security

DJI warns that restrictions on these categories could lead to increased costs for operators, potentially jeopardizing access to essential tools for public safety agencies and farmers, and forcing small businesses to replace functioning equipment with more expensive alternatives.

Encouragement for Public Participation

DJI is urging U.S. drone operators to participate in the FCC’s comment period, which is open until September 2, 2026. The company encourages stakeholders to share their experiences with drone usage, the importance of specific capabilities, and the potential impact of restrictions on their operations and communities.

The FCC has not yet adopted the proposed restrictions, and its July action seeks public input on whether additional prohibitions should apply to categories of foreign-produced drones deemed to have military capabilities or pose national security risks. DJI’s response underscores the practical implications for commercial operators, as advanced drone capabilities increasingly serve both civilian and defense purposes.

The outcome of this proposal could significantly influence the availability of certain drone models used across various sectors, including public safety and agriculture, in the United States.