Ontario Anti-drone Startup Probe Raises Red Flags
Photo credit: Jerry Tong/YouTube
Check out the Best Deals on Amazon for DJI Drones today!
A strange case out of Ontario is putting a spotlight on how far is too far when developing counter drone technology, especially when that work happens far from regulated labs and far too close to home.
Four people now face serious criminal charges after police allege they stored materials that could be turned into explosives inside a residential home in London, Ontario, as CBC reports.
Police have been investigating inside the residence at 212 Chesham Pl., in London, Ontario
Photo credit: Alessio Donnini/CBC
What makes this case stand out for the drone industry is the accused claim they were building a military grade anti drone system and actively pitching it to investors.
From garage startup to police investigation
The investigation began after a trespassing call from Western University in late January, which led police to a nearby house in the University Heights neighborhood. That home later became the focus of a multi day search, resulting in charges related to high explosives and firearms manufacturing.
Jerry Tong, Zekun Wang and Fei Han appear in a YouTube video designed to pitch the weapon system to prospective investors.
Photo credit: Jerry Tong/YouTube
In a YouTube pitch video titled MORSLAB Pitch Presentation, three of the accused described themselves as founders of a startup developing a system to stop weaponized drones.
The video shows CNC machining in a garage, references an on site chemical lab, and even includes footage of one team member working from the bed of a pickup truck parked at the same address police searched.
To engineers in the drone defense world, the early stage setup itself did not immediately raise eyebrows. Several founders pointed out that starting in a garage or apartment is almost a rite of passage in hardware startups, especially for recent engineering graduates trying to validate an idea before raising serious capital.
Where things stop looking normal is when firearms and explosive materials allegedly enter the picture.
Microwave weapons that actually make sense
According to the MORSLAB pitch, the system they were building uses directed microwave energy to disable drones by damaging their onboard electronics. That concept is not science fiction.
A rendering of the proposed drone defence system
Photo credit: Jerry Tong/YouTube
Experts familiar with counter drone systems say the explanation shown in the video is technically plausible. High powered microwave weapons can interfere with or destroy sensitive electronics by inducing currents in tiny copper traces, much like metal sparking inside a household microwave.
In simple terms, overwhelm the drone’s brain and it stops flying.
This type of electronic attack fits squarely within known counter UAS research, and similar concepts are already being explored by military contractors and specialized startups. Engineers who reviewed the pitch said the core idea checks out on a conceptual level.
What does not line up is the alleged presence of explosive chemicals or firearms, which are not required for microwave based drone defense systems.
Safety, regulation, and a hard stop
Counter drone technology sits in one of the most regulated corners of the aerospace world. Even testing non kinetic systems typically requires advance notice, permits, and coordination with national defense authorities.
Industry veterans say working with defense related hardware outside approved facilities is not just risky from a legal standpoint, but physically dangerous. Improvised labs, unknown storage conditions, and unregulated materials create a scenario where a mistake could end very badly, very fast.
Parth Mahendru is the co-founder and CEO of Toronto-based Prandtl Dynamics, which creates drone defence technology.
Photo credit: Jerry Tong/YouTube
Several experts expressed relief that authorities intervened, regardless of how the legal process ultimately unfolds. From their perspective, this case looks less like bold innovation and more like a lack of guardrails.
All four accused remain in custody as of this writing, with bail hearings scheduled and further updates expected from police.
DroneXL’s Take
This story is a reminder that while the drone industry rewards bold thinking, it does not excuse reckless execution. Building anti drone systems in a garage is one thing. Stockpiling materials that raise explosive and firearms concerns is something else entirely.
Counter UAS is a serious field with serious consequences, and the moment innovation crosses into unregulated defense work, the risks multiply faster than any startup pitch deck can justify. For drone engineers watching this unfold, the lesson is clear: creativity matters, but compliance and safety matter more.
Photo credit: Alessio Donnini/CBC, Jerry Tong, YouTube.