FCC Chairman Reveals New Drone Exemptions At CES 2026, Outlines Path To “American Drone Dominance”

Photo credit: CES / C-SPAN

Amazon Drone Deals: DJI Mini 5 Pro Fly More Combo with DJI RC2 now for $1,099!

I just watched the C-SPAN video of FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s appearance at CES 2026 in Las Vegas, and while most tech coverage focused on his Wi-Fi and 6 GHz announcements, the drone community should be paying closer attention to what he said about “unleashing American drone dominance” and the new exemption pathways he outlined for the Covered List restrictions.

The timing matters. Just two weeks ago, the FCC added foreign-made drones to its Covered List, effectively blocking new DJI products from entering the U.S. market. At CES, Carr revealed that his agency has already issued guidance creating three distinct exemption pathways for drone operators and manufacturers caught in the regulatory crossfire.

The Las Vegas Police Demonstration That Set The Tone

Before taking the CES stage, Carr made an adjacent stop that reveals where the administration’s priorities actually lie. He attended an event at the Las Vegas Police Department where they unveiled “more than a dozen new U.S. drones to help improve public safety.“

This wasn’t coincidental photo-op scheduling. It was a deliberate message: the Covered List restrictions aren’t meant to ground American drone operations. They’re meant to shift market share from Chinese manufacturers to domestic producers. “Tech that you usually just see here on the show floor, you can already see out on the street in Las Vegas,” Carr told the audience.

The LVPD demonstration featured American-made UAS systems from manufacturers on the Pentagon’s Blue UAS list. For Carr, it was proof-of-concept that U.S. law enforcement can transition away from DJI without losing operational capability.

Three Exemption Pathways The Industry Needs To Understand

The most significant news from Carr’s CES appearance came almost as an aside. He confirmed that his agency has created new guidance establishing three distinct pathways for drones to avoid Covered List restrictions.

First: Pentagon Blue UAS List. Drones that appear on the Department of Defense’s approved list are now explicitly exempted from FCC Covered List restrictions. This was expected but hadn’t been formally confirmed until now. The Blue UAS list currently includes manufacturers like Skydio, Parrot, and several smaller American drone makers.

Second: Buy America Domestic End Products. Drones that qualify as domestic end products under the Buy America program, meaning 65% or more of their components are manufactured in the United States, receive automatic exemption. This creates a pathway for foreign-designed drones with substantial U.S. manufacturing to remain legal.

Third: Case-by-Case Clarity Mechanism. “We created another third mechanism where folks that want additional clarity, and there will be them, can seek some additional clarity about our approach to drones,” Carr explained. The specifics of this petition process remain unclear, but it suggests individual manufacturers or operators can request exemption determinations directly from the FCC.

For Part 107 operators and commercial drone businesses, that third pathway may prove critical. If you’re operating foreign-made drones in critical infrastructure inspection, agriculture, or public safety applications, there may be a formal process to continue those operations while the industry transitions.

The National Security Determination That Changed Everything

Carr provided new context on how the December Covered List addition actually happened.

“At the end of last year, the administration, the executive branch, National Security Agencies, sent the FCC a national security determination that found that foreign-made drones pose an unacceptable national security risk to the country,” he said.

This matters because it clarifies the chain of authority. The FCC didn’t initiate the ban. They implemented a determination that came from national security agencies.

“Our job at the FCC, under the statutory framework, is to take that national determination and implement it through our Covered List, which we did,” Carr explained.

For those who argued the FCC bypassed the NDAA-mandated audit requirement, Carr’s comments confirm the interagency workaround that allowed the December 23 deadline to pass without a formal security review. Multiple agencies “concurred” in a determination, satisfying the statutory requirement without the individual agency audit the law originally mandated.

Photo credit: CES / C-SPAN

What “American Drone Dominance” Actually Means

The phrase “American drone dominance” appeared multiple times in Carr’s CES appearance, echoing language from President Trump’s executive order on airspace sovereignty. But what does it mean in practice?

“President Trump and all across the administration were working to unleash American drone dominance,” Carr said. “I think generally trying to make sure that America dominates in this space is a good thing, and we’re going to continue to work with industry to provide the certainty that they need.”

The Las Vegas Police deployment illustrates the intended trajectory. American manufacturers filling the gap left by restricted foreign competitors. Government contracts flowing to domestic producers. A drone industrial base that doesn’t depend on Chinese supply chains.

Whether American manufacturers can actually meet this demand at competitive price points remains the central question. The policy framework is now in place. The supply side has yet to prove itself.

DroneXL’s Take

Carr’s CES appearance revealed something important: the FCC isn’t treating the drone restrictions as a static ban. They’re actively building exemption pathways and working with domestic manufacturers to ensure the transition doesn’t crater American drone operations.

The three exemption pathways are significant. The Blue UAS list exemption was expected. The 65% domestic content threshold creates a clear manufacturing target for companies that want to continue serving the U.S. market. And the case-by-case petition process suggests individual operators aren’t completely without recourse.

But here’s what concerns me: the Las Vegas Police demonstration featured a dozen American drones. A dozen. DJI’s market share suggests hundreds of thousands of drones are currently operating in professional applications across the United States. Can American manufacturers actually scale to replace that capacity? And at what price point?

The policy machinery is moving fast. The domestic manufacturing capacity isn’t moving at the same speed. That gap is where real operational problems will emerge for commercial operators over the next 12 to 24 months.

What exemption pathway are you pursuing for your operations? Let us know in the comments below.

Editorial Note: This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI to ensure technical accuracy and archive retrieval. All insights, industry analysis, and perspectives were provided exclusively by Haye Kesteloo and our other DroneXL authors, editors, and Youtube partners to ensure the “Human-First” perspective our readers expect.